Evaluating Robustness of Exterior Lightguide

In this example, we will use Speos and optiSLang to analyze the robustness of a prismatic light guide and quantify the failure rate due to production tolerances in an automated way.
We will understand which tolerances lead to regulation fails for the automotive Day-Time-Running Lights and which tolerances must be improved to increase the optical performance. Additionally, we will evaluate the scattering of the homogeneity (RMS-contrast) and the lit appearance (average luminance) to see what the worst design looks like due to tolerances.

download example

Notes: Software Prerequisites:

To be able to use this example, the following tools and assets need to be installed on your computer:

• Ansys Speos 2023 R2 or later
• Ansys optiSLang 2023 R2 or later

Overview

In the automotive lighting application, daytime running lights are used to create a unique lighting signature. These lightguides are nearly on all the time and need to comply with high homogeneity standards and the regulation posed by the government. To perform this robustness analysis, we use a design created with Ansys Speos Optical Part Design. Ansys optiSLang will be used to drive the scattering parameter change and subsequently check the robustness of the design against the production tolerances. Tolerances on the position of the LED, energy of the light source, as well as the deviation of the trimming ratios and milling are considered.

Step 1: Ansys Speos Model

Demonstrate Speos lightguide simulation containing a colorimetric radiance map and an Intensity map with a regulation check.

Step 2: optiSLang Robustness Analysis

Demonstrate the robustness evaluation capabilities by analyzing the initial (best) design regarding production tolerances and quantifying the failure rate (probability of failure) as a criterion for robustness.

Run and Results

Step 1: Run Speos best design model

1. Open the Ansys Speos model Headlamp_LG_Robustness.scdocx (located “.\optiSLang_project_with_reference\01_reference\Headlamp_LG_Robustness.scdocx”)
2. Perform a local compute of the direct simulation “Lightguide”.

The two results, intensity map and radiance map, are used to measure the optical performance in terms of regulation and homogeneity.
The grid view of the intensity map highlights the regulation compliance

Each of the boxes represents a measurement point of intensity specified by the regulation. The center value represents the simulation result, the bottom left represents the minimum limit to pass, the top left value is the maximum limit to pass the regulation, and the right side will represent personally set safety margins. If a regulation fails, it will be highlighted in red. If the safety margin is not met, it will be highlighted in yellow. If the regulation is passed, it is highlighted in green.
In the radiance map, the measurements for the homogeneity performance are defined. The measurements are based on an 18-point polyline. The radiance is evaluated along the line. This will be used to measure the average radiance and RMS contrast.

These are the outputs that will be used for the robustness analysis. The goal is to evaluate the scattering of the RMS contrast and the average of the polyline and the related compliance with the ECE regulation.

The best design (initial design) shows an RMS contrast of 0.156 and an average luminance of 161 kcd/m²:

Step 2: optiSLang Robustness Analysis

1. Open LG_Robustness.opf (located in “.\optiSLang_project_with_reference\”) and click “relocate files automatically” when optiSLang asks.
2. Double-click on the “Robustness”-system to see the defined scattering parameter, sampling method, and criteria.
3. To review the results of the robustness analysis, right-click on the “MOP” node, which is connected to the system, and select 'show Postprocessing'. The file already contains the results of the robustness analysis.
4. Optional: to regenerate the picture you can rerun the study. To do this, right-click on “Robustness”-system and select “Start from here”.
   HINT: The step-by-step tutorial shows how to create the automated workflow (solver chain) and how to set up the sensitivity analysis. (The tutorial can be found in the download folder: “.\optiSLang_Prismatic_Light_Guide_2023R2_Robustness.pdf”).

The “Robustness”-system shows the necessary solver chain to perform the lightguide analysis and is used to run the robustness analysis in order to identify important tolerances and to evaluate the results statistically.

The robustness analysis is based on a previous lightguide optimization.
The system is defined to include pictures and to keep the result files of each simulation. Due to the size, these pictures and result files are not delivered with this example.

Postprocessing 1: Identify and understand important tolerance

The COP-Matrix in the optiSLang postprocessing shows us which of the considered tolerances have an impact on the optical performance and the single regulations. With this, we can answer the question “Which tolerance must be improved to increase the robustness of the design?”
The shift of the LED in y-direction (“LED_delta_y”) and the energy of the LED (“Flux”) have the strongest influence on the average as well as on the regulations. The RMS contrast depends on the production-based deviation of the trimming ratios and the milling value.

The Metamodel of Optimal Prognosis (MOP) approximates the response as a function of all important input parameters. By clicking on one of the “Total” updates, the 3d Response surface is plotted. This plot is the representation of the metamodel based on the two main contributors and the remaining ones are set to a fixed value. By using the sliders (see picture below) you can see the influence of the other dimensions.

Based on the metamodels we can understand where (in which range of the tolerances) the regulations are not fulfilled, or where the optical performance is the worst.

	Green : Design is feasible Orange : Design is still feasible number of rules limited passed ≤ 2 Magenta : Design is not feasible: number of rules limited passed > 2 RMS contrast > 0.2 Average < 160 kcd/m²

Hint: The colored points were not saved in the provided data. How Tto color the different designs is shown in the step-by-step tutorial, (The tutorial can be found in the download folder: “.\optiSLang_Prismatic_Light_Guide_2023R2_Robustness.pdf”)

Postprocessing 2: Get the probability of failure

Furthermore, the robustness analysis shows the statistical distribution of the device response due to the manufacturing tolerances (scattering of the output parameters). With this, we answer questions like “How robust is the light guide?” What percentage of fabricated devices will not meet the required design goal or will not fulfill the regulations?”

1. In the optiSLang postprocessing, click on “Limits” under “Edit” in the menu bar.
   1. Add “Safety limit” for specifications
   2. Add “Failure limits” for national regulations and optical performance (e.g. average luminance)
      
2. Add “Histogram”-Plot to the postprocessing scenery and choose one of the outputs (e.g. “Average”)
   How to do this is shown in the step-by-step tutorial. (The tutorial can be found in the download folder: “.\optiSLang_Prismatic_Light_Guide_2023R2_Robustness.pdf”).
3. Check distribution and statistical data in the histogram plot for the average:
   1. The probability that the average is smaller than 160kcd/m² is 3.0%. This represents a sigma level of 2.18.
   2. In combination with the Metamodel for the average, we can see that we can improve the robustness of the lightguide by tuning the tolerances of the LED energy and the LED y-position.
      E.g. if it can be ensured that the maximal y-position of the LED is smaller than 0.5 mm, then we get a robust design regarding the average luminance
      
4. Check statistical data for all other output parameters
   

Summary robustness analysis

Based on the robustness analysis we understand how robust the design is and which possibilities we have to improve the robustness of the design:

Furthermore, we can see how the worst design looks like under consideration of the tolerances:

	worst design regarding RMS contrast due to tolerances	worst design regarding average luminance due to tolerances	Nominal Design (= best design from optimization)
RMS contrast	0.44	0.15	0.15
Average luminance [kcd/m²]	154 > 165 (not fulfilled)	129 > 165 (not fulfilled)	162 > 165 (fulfilled)
Number of not fulfilled regulations	0/42 (fulfilled)
Result Picture
Section View

Important model settings

Speos model settings

Lightguide meshing

A precise meshing of the lightguide is extremely important. The prisms can get extremely small. If this is not accounted for in the meshing, no light will be extracted from the lightguide. Use Local Meshing on important optical geometries.

Maximum number of surface interaction

A lightguide relies on Total Internal Reflection to guide the light, resulting in a lot of surface interactions. The default value of 100 is often too low.

XML Template

The XML template in the sensor definition is used to export the measurements to make them usable in optiSLang

optiSLang

Speos settings

Double click on “Ansys Speos” node to change the settings:

• Parametrization Tab:
  • Define parameter that should be considered in the variation analysis
• Execution settings Tab:
  • define the Speos version to use (minimum version is 2023R2)
  • choose batch mode / GUI mode (Gui mode might be useful for bug fixing)
  • add a Python script that executes before or after the design is updated
    (e.g. needed for coupling Speos with CAD-Tools like Catia / Inventor / NX / Creo)
• Speos Simulation Tab:
  • select the simulations to be exported in the design directory and resolved by the Speos Core node
• Export Tab:
  • selected formats are written as result files in the design directory (e.g., export image file of the design and include it in the optiSLang post processing to increase design understanding)

Solver settings

Double click on the “SpeosCore” node to change the settings:

• number of used cores
• activate solve on GPU

Robustness settings

Double-click on the “Robustness” – system:

• to change the scattering parameter properties in the “Parameter” tab
• to change values for the reference design in the “Parameter” tab
• to change the number of samples in the “Dynamic sampling” tab
• to view the results in the “result designs” tab.
  

Updating the model with your parameter

Add more Parameters:

To add new parameters you need to use the Publish parameter feature in the Workbench tab and you can select any Speos feature to publish any available Property of this Object. ( Defining the Speos Parameters to Use in optiSLang (ansys.com) )

You can also create SpaceClaim Driving dimension or SpaceClaim script parameters. All SpaceClaim parameters will be automatically displayed and read by the Speos integration in optiSLang.

Create a new optiSLang Robustness study

To define an optiSLang robustness study from scratch you can use the Step-by-Step Tutorial added to this data. It will allow you to understand the creation Process of an optiSLang Robustness evaluation with Speos.

Add new outputs to the simulation report

To add new outputs, it is needed to add new measurements to the XML-Templates selected in the simulation setup. The easiest way to do this is by replacing the existing XML-Templates from the input files or reselecting it in the sensor definition. XML-Templates are created by creating a measurement on the XMP map and then exporting this measurement to an XML-Template.

By editing the Speos reader node the outputs will be added to the optiSLang project. You can find a detailed step-by-step guide in the Ansys Learning Hub or in the reference folder for this article's data.

Taking the model further

To increase the understanding on “how robust is the light guide design,” the activation of the result images in the optiSLang postprocessing, as well as the “Parallel Coordinates Plot” (PCP), can be used. With the PCP, it is possible to visualize the dependencies between the input and output parameters, as well as to identify the ranges of the scattering parameters in which the light guide is robust. Furthermore, a coloring of a design set helps to identify the regions where the robustness criteria (limits) are fulfilled.
How to do this is shown in the step-by-step tutorial of light guide optimization (Exterior Lightguide Optimization – Ansys Optics) .

Additional resources

Related KB pages:

• Creating a Lightguide
• Exterior Lightguide Optimization

Related Ansys Innovation Courses

• Optics | Lighting Design - Ansys Speos Optical Part Design Advanced (sapjam.com)
• Ansys optiSLang Getting Started | Ansys Training